Wednesday, March 02, 2005

Rule by Injudicious Judiciary?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no civil liberties in the graveyard. During WW2 we had our 'civil liberties' curtailed - for the duration. There were signs that read 'careless talk costs lives', British Citizens were encouraged to keep an eye on odd looking people, to eavesdrop etc. Nothing wrong with that, just civil defence.

The shoe bomber would have succeeded had not people been vigilant and tackled him.

They introduced internment for Japs and Krauts, Italians living in the UK. We are too PC and cowed to do that but at least we must target the most likely group to committ terrorist atrocities and sorry folks on here but that does mean focuinsg on our muslim bretheren - and before you have a hissy fit, a woman on ch 5 the Wright Stuff this morning concurred with that - and she was a British Muslim!

The home secretary must decide, not judges who are nototiously liberal and would have the likes of Ian Huntley wandering the streets if they had their way.

The tories are a disgrace not supporting Clarke and playing politics with our lives. We need a Guatanamo Bay in the UK.

Our criminals are treated like royalty and the US could teach us a lot about penal rectitude.

Habeas corpus can be suspended in times of emergency. The French lock up people similarly and cannot understand what the fuss is all about.

Come on all you pro EUers and support Clarke!

No comments: