Tuesday, November 26, 2019

Mixed economy consensus RIP

Now the mixed economy consensus has bin dumped in the garbage can of history by Jeremy and his un merry band of Marxists we can survey the political landscape yes with horror but also hope for if it is ok to say socialism in tooth and clause four is back with a vengeance post mixed economy, why not  19th century liberal laissez faire capitalism  too for surely  what's sauce for the goose is, etc.

This is where the Capitalist Party comes in, to protect people from politicians and their statist agendas. Two can play at the pure undiluted ideology game and we at least have a record of success on our side whereas all the socialists have is a century of emmisseration, gulag concentration camps and a mass collection of corpses on an industrial scale (one death is a tragedy, 100 million is a statistic).

An unapologetic defense of capitalism is the only antidote to the rabid unchallenged Marxist drivel being spouted by Labour and we are sorry to say the Conservatives  have as I indicate below no ideological counter to their ugly anti human narrative of self sacrifice and death because they are cut from the same traditionalist altruist Christian cloth.

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Why Conservatives cannot defend Capitalism on Moral grounds

Conservatives will never be heard defending capitalism on moral and ethical grounds. They are very careful to avoid what they see as a moral minefied and concentrate exclusively on economics. Because socialism and communism as an economic theory was exploded in the last century this is pretty safe territory but it avoids the chief and fundamental issue which everyone places way above economics and that is ethics and morality.

Here the tories are very weak and vulnerable and it shows. They become evasive and apologetic and end up in the position of conceding implicitly that socialism is morally superior to capitalism but they will manage it better economically and will 'balance the books' thus conceding the moral high ground to the Left and appearing shifty and defensive towards capitalism, damning it with faint praise.

This is why socialism never dies and keeps on coming out of remission as it has never been confronted head on and the reason is quite simple. At the heart of socialism is the Christian philosophy of altruism, the idea that human beings exist to serve others and as both the socialist movement and the conservative movements come out of the Christian tradition of self sacrifice and and altruism the latter cannot take a principled stand against it without betraying their Christian heritage and traditions.

Only a political movement unburdened by the self immolating Christian baggage of altruism and self sacrifice can morally challenge and reject socialism effectively and put forward a philosophy of self interest and independence and champion the only political system that allows it expression and full unobstructed rein, namely capitalism. That is why we need a Capitalist Party.

The New Politics

The new politics would involve a system where no politician or party would be able to include in their manifesto any promise to take money away from individuals or businesses that had earned it and give it to others who have not in exchange for their vote. The state would have no tax or regulating powers over individuals and businesses.

The buying of votes is corruption and it would be prohibited by law in a written constitution. This would effectively make socialism history. Statism would be ended at a stroke of the pen. Only the details would remained to be adumbrated.

The proper and sole role of the state to protect individual rights from individuals or groups who would threaten such through either force or fraud would be effected by police, courts, prisons and armed forces and these would be funded by voluntary taxation contributions.

This would be effected over a 20 year period of transition and during that time all taxation would be reduced incrementally to prepare people for the change until they are reduced ultimately to 0%.

Democratism and it s Endgame

The fact that the British people could be just weeks away from coming under the iron heel of  a Marxist authoritarian junta should give even the most wildly enthusiastic advocates  of democracy pause. Perhaps that is too much to expect these days when those selfsame champions  of democracy have just pushed it under the bus yet still have the brassneck to actually knock on people's doors asking for their vote in the coming election!

People say calm down there is not going to be a Corbyn government and that s as may be but I don't want to live under a system that even allows for any such possibility. Would it be too much to demand that any political ideology that was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of millions of people in the last century namely communism socialism should not be allowed on the ballot box?

How about the Nazi Party? Another gift of democracy. The anti democratic democrats have done us all a favour by revealing how paper thin their belief in it it actually was and we can reflect on the fact that it was always suspect and could now lead us into a ballot boxed Marxist tyranny. 

Friday, November 22, 2019

Political Realignment?

The solution to our political class's identity crisis is simple. Listening to the Conservative balanced book blue socialists and the Labour very unbalanced books red socialists it is clear that the two main statist parties should jettison their narcissism of very small differences and simple merge into one. We already have a defacto one party state and this would simply make it official.

Then a pro capitalist party could emerge to challenge the statist quo  and provide true as opposed to claimed political plurality into the system. It would also serve to illustrate how similar the two parties are ideologically, both believing in big government interventionism, just geographically in differently located on  the mixed economy spectrum. The destination is the same: more government less freedom.

This would provide such clarity in people's minds and enhance the public discourse to something approaching healthy as opposed to the present environment of doubletalk  intellectual murk and  tergiversation surrounding it, contributing to the distrust of the public and its general perception of a  shamed low dishonest political class.

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Why is Socialism still a thing?

Why has socialism returned like a cancer from remission? I blame the Blue Socialists, the Managerial Socialists, the Tories. They made it respectable again. Thatcher use the word socialist as a term of abuse whilst post Maggie it is seen as something that can be tamed and and managed and thus has been detoxified and rendered innocuous in the eyes of the public rather than perceived as something to be universally rejected, feared and held in contempt.

Hence Corbyn. Yes he has fanboys and girls in the tax funded universities who should have to take a gap year in some socialist hell-hole like Venezuela, Cuba or North Korea before they are allowed anywhere near a UK ballot box but too many adults who should know better are behind this wittering incubus and his sinister henchman Macdonnel, the cold assassin of liberal values and individual rights the very rock and foundation of whatever prosperity and financial freedom is left in this compromised mixed economy.

Should Corbyn win there would be a flight of capital, a run on the pound, its value would drop on the international markets by as much as 25%. Some civilian militias could form having no doubt previously acquired and accumulated arms caches on the black market and prepared for such a dire eventuality and there could even be a revolt in the higher echelons of the military itself, tanks on the street and martial law declared. The Marxist ringleaders would be swiftly arrested and jailed whilst a coalition government was quickly formed and another election declared in a week's time to effect a smooth transition to civilian rule.

Too far fetched? Perhaps, but consider the implications of a Corbyn victory. The US would immediately declare its special relationship with the UK officially dead. It would assume the status of  a hostile player knowing all that is known of Corbyn's allegiances with every low life scum terrorist outfit across the world going back decades. It would be ranked alongside Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea as countries not to do business with. It could no longer be part of Nato or even the EU as the latter, contrary to what many hold, does uphold some standards of decency and liberal norms which a Corbyn government would by its very nature contradict at every turn, hence Corbyn's instinctive animus to the EU for the longest time.

Old people trudging in the snow  voting to prevent a Marxist dictator coming to power in a winter election must be the worst thing to befall this country since the blitz and its hard to believe its not just a terrible nightmare from which we will at some point awaken with a shudder but no it is actually happening. But what can we do about it?

Sunday, October 27, 2019

Brexiters, let me break it to you gently..

It ain't happening. Sorry. I need no Nostradamic powers whatsoever to tell you this. Kindergarden reading skills will suffice. Read the writing on the wall - it's in neon. The Establishment has been trying in its oh-so subtle ways to tell you for the longest time but your dangerous and naive belief in silly  old traditions commonly known as Democratic Norms has blinded you to this obvious truth.

We are now in a post-Democratic era my friends. I had to do it. The truth will set you free, even if its a terrible frightening discombobulating  thing. Just give it time to slowly sink in. You cannot move forward until you do.

Now what are you going to do? Set fire to shops, loot, kill another MP? Well, there's that. But seriously what can you do? When Democracy has been betrayed by the very people who you thought - up to a short while ago at least - were its living embodiment and stalwart champions?

 Process,integrate this new knowledge. And maybe even dare to ask yourself whether a system of majority rule was ever the best way to run our affairs especially when if you boil it down it is nothing more than pure collectivism anyway, majority rule. Would you want people to vote on your shopping list? You wanted pea soup but the People want guacomole so get used to it.

Let's give the ex democrats what they richly reserve. Reject democracy and opt instead for a system predicated on individual rights and the only know system that is compatible with it, namely, Capitalism.

Thursday, October 24, 2019

A Few months is a long time in politics....

Well since we last convened lol we have become a Banana Republic, but with the bananas Monarchy still sadly in place though - perhaps not  for much longer as the Prince and Princess of Woke slowly descend into a spiral of madness and disappear up their respective fundaments.

Still we have more important things to concern ourselves with such as how to adjust to the fact that we are on the precipice of tumbling into an authoritarian totalitarian state with a zombie government of quislings and lickspittles holding us captive in their vortex of  obsfuscatory white noise double speak word salad.

People laughed when I said Borris should plant his tanks on Parliament square and flush out the co opted Brussels-captured traitors and Cromwell-fashion flush them out the Houses of toilet chambers but that's about the only thing that will work right now.

Remoaner Remember the 5th of November. It's just a beat away.

Sunday, June 16, 2019

Is a basic Income ok?

No, it is paying people for existing and very immoral. It is welfare on stilts and whilst it is a massive simplification of an extremely complex unwieldy cumbersome Byzantine bureaucratic multi duplicating wasteful welfare system  and therefor as such, an improvement, the idea of unearned income still remains fundamentally immoral and evil.

It is based on the profoundly erroneous concept of  scarcity sustainability and limits to growth theory as though the stuff that can be produced is finite and human beings will cease to be productive beyond a certain point as they will run out of resources and ideas. All of human history has proved this to be a groundless fallacy as endless inventions and innovations ensure that no such limit to human creativity has ever or will ever occur just as long as human beings continue to think and innovate.

New forms of work will evolve, new jobs appear and the end of work and creativity will remain the apocalyptic and armageddon fantasy of statists with no clue about human creativity and its limitless potential.

Is Tax on Ai Robots Ok

No, it s a tax on intellectual property and the creators of artificial intelligence have brought huge value, efficiency, innovation,creativity and genius to bear on discovering and inventing the technology that allows tremendous exponential improvements in productivity to business and industry and for that sin they are to be punished with swingeing taxation?

This would be a tax on creativity and genius and makes as much sense as taxing the inventor of the tractor for reducing the workforce on the land and raising productivity a thousandfold.

Intellectual property is a vital component of the capitalist system where virtual reality plays an essential role in the economy and a tax on that is a tax on man's mind and creativity. Taxing robots sounds seductively appealing  to the unthinking because it implies it is not a tax on a human being but a souless robot and machine but as the robot and artificial intelligence is the brain child of human being it is every bit as much a tax on humans as the traditional taxation but in a sense it is worse as the amount of effort, brainpower and genius that went in to creating this amazing revolutionary invention involve heroic acts of supreme intellectual genius  such that it should be respected all the more that the brawn of a million drone workers merely repeating the learned and taught motions of others. 

Thursday, June 13, 2019

Common Fallacy surrounding 'Big Tech' Platforms

Why do people think Facebook, Twitter and Google etc are the public property of their users? Because it is a platform with public access they mistakenly view it as a public service taking umbrage if their account is suspended or deleted due to content issues and whine they are being censored forgetting only the state has such powers.

Is a publisher who decides to no longer publish an author censoring them? Is a company that hires out buildings for venues censoring an act they refuse to host deeming it hostile or counter to their business ethos? Is a newspaper that refuses to carryarticles from a particular columnist censoring them?These are not state actors but privately owned and run companies with fully protected property rights.

 Facebook etc invariably do not charge for the use of their platforms and yet get endless vilification from ungrateful users with serious entitlement issues.Whether it be a physical location or one in virtual reality property rights and intellectual rights still apply and the principle holds no matter what some concrete bound mentalities assert to the contrary.

Why do Businessmen make terrible politicians

They fail to transition and grasp the fundamental difference between the public and private sphere, the difference between business and politics and exercise arbitrary personal whim in public life as if the State were their personal fiefdom subject to random dictat.

Participation in the private sphere is voluntary, the public not and due restraint is therfor required in the latter to assure an absence of duress force and coercion which the businessman turned politician fails to recognize rendering them authoritarian and despotic, impatient and contemptuous of pesky things like individual rights, focusing instead entirely on outcomes to their gargantuan grandiose statist projects and programmes, riding roughshod over liberties in the process.

Why is Religion the greatest man made evil in human history

Because it was the first totalitarian system from which all subsequent ones were spawned. Communism, Fascism, Socialism, Mixed Economy, Welfarism, Compte Altruism, are all the projeny of religion without which they would have been stillborn. Minus the dynamic and imprimatur of the religious altruist imperative, the sacrifice of Self to others, the alter, the authoritarian absolute state commanding total acquiescence would never have gained any traction.

The rein of terror of Dark Ages mysticism prefigured and provenanced all the 20th century totalitarian horrors and its altruist ethos remains potent and animates politics to this day.

Wednesday, June 12, 2019

Does Christianity Still pose a threat to individual rights and liberty

Yes, observe the anti abortion legislation in the US - a country which expressly enshrined the separation of church and state in its constitution. The church as we can see was defanged but not reformed, the old ugly nature remained the same, it was merely stripped of its political power. Or so we thought..  Its old despotic nature is alive and well and ready to start controlling women and their reproductive organs all over again.

Make no mistake, the greatest man made evil of all time, Religion is making a comeback, is on the march again  whether it be Christianity or Izlam (piss be upon it) and its totalitarian ambitions are undimned by the passing centuries and the trail of blood havoc and corpses left behind in its inhuman and barbaric depredations

Who are the Drug Prohibitionsts

Those with authoritarian statist inclinations, invariably of a religious persuasion - it goes with the territory. Observe their causal blase disregard and scorn they display for individual rights as they advocate invasive state action against the personal  choices of individuals and enlist state power to control what a person ingests injects or inhales. Your body belongs to the state is the implicit message they dare not make explicit, which would expose their totalitarian disposition.

Just as the earlier evangelical missionary prohibitionists the anti drug are driven by religious zealotry and should be disavowed as the puritan Dark Ages atavists they are.

Tuesday, June 11, 2019

Why are UK business groups so cravenly pro EU

They are Brussels funded and captured and like being part of the highly protectionist EU bloc which insulates them from competition from beyond its borders  in a rigged and fixed market.

If they were for free trade and capitalism they would be speaking up and daily issuing grave warnings about the imminent and very real threat of a Marxist Corbyn Labour government but they have said nothing,zero, nada.

Business may once in the mists of time have been pro free market capitalism but today's average businessman is a pathetic co opted subsidised statist hireling mouthing pro big government propaganda, shilling for the state. (Ref any Cbi spokesman). They do not advocate for capitalism but its complete abandonment.

Should the Bbc interview Extinction rebellion spokespersons

No, they are a terrorist organization threatening to use violence to close down  an airport and prevent hundreds of thousands of people going about their business and by giving them a platform the Bbc is complicit and party to an act of terrorism and should have its licence revoked and be closed down.

The eco terrorist group has further threatened to use drones at airports which is a threat to mass murder and they should be arrested immediately, charged and prosecuted under the terrorist act.

Violence is the use of force and blocking people's path and preventing them from free movement is an act of violence and the very antithesis of 'peaceful protest' and to mischaracterize it thus is Orwellian and speaks to the totalitarian nature of the Extinction Rebellion movement.

Is fake News a valid term

Yes just listen to any Bbc news content with everything filtered thru a leftist context whether it be news bulletins or comment. What is prioritized as news, how it is graded and hierachized, the slant, the spin, the emphasis and interpretation placed upon it, the intonation and inflexion of voice, what is included, what  is omitted, who is invited to comment, with what regularity, how they are interviewed, how many times interrupted and talked over, the cordiality or hostility with which they are addressed and treated etc.

There are a thousand ways bias and prejudice, tendentiousness and partiality can be expressed and conveyed, agendas manifest themselves and find expression.

In a commercial broadcaster liberal left views would often struggle for market share but as the Bbc is funded by a State mandated co opted public license system that is no obstacle to its relentless 24\7 left-pushing agendas.

Monday, June 10, 2019

Why are most Conservatives Statist

They are invariably paternalist, usually religious and have swallowed altruism whole and cannot consequently take an ethical moral stand against its corollary and political expression of Welfare.

Being Christian such Conservatives have authoritarian impulses and will lean to totalitarian positions on such things as drugs prohibition and anti abortion and fully endorse strict curbs on the free market such as taxation and oppressive regulation, instigate vast state infrastructure programmes, defend socialized healthcare, anti trust measures, the creation of numberless government industry watchdogs quangoes, oppose mergers and acquisitions, stifle business, rein it in and bolster the mixed economy fully convinced they are doing God's work protecting the poor and vulnerable from unchecked rampant capitalism.

This is typical leftist Conservatism, its near universal orthodoxy which in all essentials is indistinguishable form leftist socialist statism.

How to identify a Statist

They love to collectivize the achievements of individuals and others with such statements as 'we as a country are great at technological innovation and scientific research'  brazenly appropriating such skills and talents to themselves, as if it were their's, as if politicians in reality did anything  other than stifle and frustrate such genius with taxation, regulation and a thousand other obstructive legislative statist measures.

Such is the essence of a parasite which is what politicians are. They take the achievements of others, bask in their reflected glory then steal the fruits of their labours thru taxation to buy the votes of welfare bums. They are the Salieri to the innovator's Mozart.

Sunday, June 09, 2019

Why do people think Anti Trump is Left wing?

It is a common trap and would be quite comical were it not so serious as trump's economic policies have way  more in common with those of Bernie Sanders than the average Republican's.Such is the power of emotionalism and tribalism to blind people to reality and it is very key to note that those arguing for a return to masculine values are the biggest cry babies ever, whining that feminism has stolen their manhood and the Chinese their jobs and begging big government to enact statist protectionist policies and tariffs to keep them in an old dead rust belt industry forever because of their infantile entitlement mentality.

Co dependence on the state and emotional incontinence are the hallmarks of Trump fandom and to criticize it is left wing! Yeah, right. If this is not cultist behaviour I do not know what is.

Religion: The last refuge of the scoundrel

When politicians invoke religion to justify and inform  their actions and policies you can see authoritarianism rearing its obscene and ugly face. Tho two are indivisible, the one the handmaiden of the other. Its no accident that when religion was at its zenith was the dark ages and it wielded merciless totalitarian power and woe betide anyone who challenged its premises and principles as they would be subject to the most barbaric and inhuman punishments and death.

Now religion is invoked by sociopaths and scoundrels like Trump and Kavanagh -both serial abusers of women who want to tell them how they should live their lives, what they can and cannot do with their bodies, claiming that their womb is the property of the state not their own. If miscreants, sexual deviants and bad ass psychos like the above get to rule and use religion to justify their arbitrary dictats America will become another dysfunctional theocracy with mad Conservative mullahs dictating women's reproductive cycles and lives, a dark age mystical priest ridden tyranny.

Why would the religious right ally with a boasting sexual offender like Trump? Because they are Christian fascists who use force and faith as social control.

America was founded on a separation of Church and State and those who seek to join them back together again are profoundly anti American and in criminal violation of constitutional rights. They are now back with a vengeance and they need to be fought or as we have seen in recent judicial developments re abortion America will be lost and become a Christian Iran.

What will be Donald Trump's Legacy

The belief that big government is good, (make the state great again), authoritarianism gets things done, you can and should do deals with evil people, control of the free press is desirable, libel laws to close down criticism are good, bullying and crudity is ok, protectionism and tarriffs, not free trade works,  the mixed economy, economic nationalism and statism is best for America not capitalism, nativism is good, immigration bad, blustering bufoonery and posturing is presidential, flip flopping and changing principle and policy on the fly from one day to the next and lying is fine as is having a hair trigger temper and the emotional intelligence of a three year old.

The fact that none of Trump's fanboys can see any of this proves we are dealing with a cult and they are its glassy eyed adherents and acolytes. Presidency as the cult of personality. He has trashed the presidency and whilst he is not a dictator or even yet a crypto fascist he has set America  on that path and smoothed the way for the genuine article. The rest is just a matter of time 

Saturday, June 08, 2019

Why is the Labour Party riven with anti semitism

It has been captured by the far left  who are anti capitalism and associate it with jewry usury and banking. This is why they are also very pro Islam which forbids usury and is also anti semitic. Labour plans to regulate and rein the banks in even more than they are now and it is  little known that the post war socialist Labour government  nationalized the bank of England and turned it a central bank enabling all subsequent governments to manipulate, corrupt, debase and debauch the currency accumulating huge debts to buy votes with pledges and promises on vast welfare spending and massively expanding the state's remit.

Anti semitism attempts to disguise its identity and ugly racist nature under the rubric of anti Zionism but this is a mere figleaf, transparent in its deception and is anti semitism in all but name,using the identical latter's arguments but flying under  false colours. 

Friday, June 07, 2019

What is the purpose of a Mayoralty

Mayors are designed to aggrandize local government and the post tends to attract chancers and grandstanders of political pull who preen and strut peacock-fashion over their petty thiefdoms. Like a state within a state, another useless tier of government, mayoralties resemble the mafia in their depredations and stranglehold on commerce and trade but with the added panoply of bureaucratic obfuscation to stifle economic growth with stultifying socialist controls,regulations and taxes.

The present London incumbent Kahn typifies the pathology of the species, exhibiting all the worse traits and characteristics of unchecked statism: narcissism, malevolence, nihilism. The corruption of local government finds its full expression in the mayoralty and it should be abolished.

Will the Establishment survive a No Brexit outcome

Not in its present form or only in the short term. If people think democracy is no longer working or does not do what it says on the tin all the institutions that argued for Remain will be regarded as suspect, corrupt, amoral and untrustworthy with diminished status and destroyed reputation.

Political instability can be expected and a mass gravitation to extremes which could lead to greater authoritarianism than exists presently with people opting for a 'strong man' who 'gets things done', a Putin or Trump.

Instead of choosing smaller government which would be the logical reaction to oppressive statism past conditioning will sadly lead them perversely to upping the poison and electing for more state control over their lives rather than less; a depressing and regrettable but all too familiar syndrome.

Thursday, June 06, 2019

WW11 Groundhog Day

Why does the UK fetishize its WW2 victory with seeming endless memorialising and self valorisation? The US bailed Britain out of two world wars but the second is surrounded in folklore chiefly due to the cult of Churchill the arch mythologiser with extraordinary albeit dubious skills of oratory and self promotion.

Promptly after the war he was rejected by the fickle electorate in favour of the Labour party who promised bread and circuses and ushered in an English socialism not dissimilar in essentials to the German Socialism it had sacrificed blood and treasure to defeating the last six years leading to the welfare state and making British subjects less free than they were before the war.

Communism was the true victor of WW2 and the Soviets were Western allies so it was an inglorious pyrrhic victory for Britain which has been glossed over with cloying sentiment and propaganda to the present day.

Britain was bankrupt after the war languishing years in poverty, emiseration and subsistence rationing and got a humiliating bailout/loan from the US which was unconstitutional foolish and ill advised as it was promptly squandered and frittered away on the Welfare State by the Labour government.

Hitler planned a European Union which was enacted by his victors rendering WW2 futile on its own terms. Claims that the EU was a bulwark against the risk of future Fascism has been embarrassingly refuted by the emergence of far Right movements across the EU.

Abstracting the Churchill cult of personality and the self congratulation WW2 achieved little and cost much for the victors.

The nauseating orgy of anniversary marking that keeps on being played out should actually be banned as it is is criminal waste of taxpayers money and a way of distracting from the statism and oppressive collectivism that the UK polity is now characterized  by and merely allows our political pygmies to channel Churchill in a hopeless attempt to bask in  distant glories and  the fading glow of his questionable triumphs and larger than life character.

Monday, May 20, 2019

What's wrong with Jordan Peterson?

Leaving aside all his virtues, communication skills as a brilliant speaker and entertainer his major flaws are his emotionalism, his religious premises -the two are closely connected as religious belief is emotionalism - and again associated with those two things, his morbid malevolent world view which colours and informs his whole schtick.That is to say his message is life is hell here's how you can make it better.No matter how great his instruction on how to make it better is, how trenchant the insights and psychological analysis are if it is based on a false foundation it is a house built on sand.

His emotionalism is particularly bad and he not infrequently brings himself to the verge of tears,his voice shaky with emotion making an embarrassing spectacle leaving a question mark over his mental stability. This is tied up with his religiosity which is not overt but more insidious and sinuous but still based on unreason and emotionality.

His analysis of the left is good and he is always worth listening to but ultimately a flawed thinker undone by his religious emotionalism and his work will have little if any lasting value.

Sunday, December 23, 2018

Liberals caught with their Pantsdown

Up until '16 the Liberals could just about get away with the great pretense that they were indeed liberals but since Brexit that pretense has been exposed in all its ugly putrescence. The fig leaf of democracy has been torn away to reveal the ugly truth beneath -the liberals are a squalid party of illiberal big government elitists with profoundly illiberal tendencie -s witness their open contempt for the 17 plus million people who voted to get out of the illiberal EU and their insistence enunciated in nauseatingly faux moral tones that they be made to go back and vote again -and this time get it right.

The death announced today of the ridiculous pompous jackass liberal grandee Paddy Ashdown is a reminder of just how out of touch with reality liberals can get. This preposterous posturing political pygmy with his faux gravitas and his delusions of competence was almost a caricature of the worst sort of liberal -smarmy, patronising suffering from acute self awareness deficit and the delusion that any fatuous statement that ushered from his lips was of interest to anyone other than his psychiatrist and his narrow band of cultic acolytes  taken in by his preening prattling vacuity masquerading as principle.

The liberals have been eviscerated since their power lusting coalition gambit backfired and one can only hope that their days in the political wilderness are long and arid  and that their tedious sanctimony never better embodied than by prattling paddy and dreams of future office and influence will be burried along with his cancer ridden corpse. 

Saturday, December 22, 2018

The Unholy Alliance of Religion and Leftism

The religious and the Left are united in their visceral loathing and fear of individualism and the self which they excoriate with a passion that is positively pathological.Fear and loathing of individualism is their sine qua non as it is a threat to their collectivist agendas.

The nihilism and misanthropy of the left with its obsession with environmentalism and its desire that people sacrifice themselves on the altar of altruism -not even for the living but the yet to be born, future generations, the non living, the non existent is echoed by the religious who demand people sacrifice themselves to a supernatural entity of such pathological magnitude that  would make Stalin and Hitler seem like plaster saints of innocence by comparison.

Individualism is conflated with solipsism,selfishness, narcissism, subjectivism, whim worshiping. The only logical conclusion when individualism is rejected is group think,collective consciousness which is outright mysticism that the left has embraced wholesale in perfect harmony with the religious who seek to destroy individualism, reason, autonomy freedom and liberty - to them  dangerous concepts based on consumerism and people pursuing their self interest.

Anti consumption, anti growth, anti capitalist, anti reason, anti man, anti pleasure here on earth, the Left has embraced every facet of dark ages religious puritanism and religious misanthropy making it regressive, nihilistic and and a philosophical threat to enlightenment universalist principles on which the modern world and civilization itself is based and dependent upon.

Wednesday, October 31, 2018

Who ARE the Far Right?

They are on the move the media tells us but  is their   characterization accurate or have they made a glaring omission? The latter I fear and am not sure it is wholly unintentional. They juxtapose the Far right with the Islamists -but why? Are not the Islamists the ultimate Far Right?

Look at the agendas of the Islamists for a few seconds and it becomes manifestly obvious that they are Far Right to the core. Misogyny? Tick Homophobia? Tick.Xenophobia -Racism? Tick. And of course let us not forget the gravest evil of the Far Right namely Anti semitism! Er, Tick Tick Tick. The only thing the Islamists do not have is: white skin. So, the argument on the left goes, they cannot possibly be Far Right!

This is the bbc line and it should be challenged head on. Islamists are the Far Right every bit as much as nay far more  than the Edl or their more virulent European equivalents who are apparently a grave threat according to latest statistics.

Frank Gardener the beeb correspondent could not seem to get his ducks in a row this morning on the Today prog as he started by saying there is a rise in violence from "the far right and far left. But a few minutes further into his commentary he reverted back to just the far right so there is some very dodgy journalism going on here as usual from the beeb.

From now on there should be pressure on the bbc to include Islamists in the category of the Far Right for no other group belongs there more than they do.

Monday, October 29, 2018

The Great Austerity Myth

The British think if they deny themselves a wafer thin mint that is austerity. The spending orgy just continues and with Hammond at the helm it will be more spend spend spend, welfare for all, corporate and individual. Even trees are going to get tens of millions. The economy will continue to be debauched, the very lodestone of the economy the tech digital industry will be eviscerated with malevolent digital tax to the likes of Amazon who have threatened to withdraw form the UK if Hammond carries out his threatened terrorist actions against them.

The socialist tories hate capitalism as much as Labour do and there is no hope for the country unless they are challenged on ideological grounds and a new movement away from the statism of both political parties and towards capitalism emerges.