Outline to a written British Constitution

Government shall have no tax raising powers

Dissolution of the monarchy

Separation of church and state

Abolition of blasphemy law

Legalisation of drugs

UK withdrawal from the UN

UK withdrawal from the EU

UK withdrawal from NATO

Capitol punishment for murder

Abolition of television licence

End to all foreign aid programmes

Sale of all government property and land,that property which is needed for armed forces bases,police stations,law courts to be be hired from private owners and privatisation of roads,streets

Abolition of state education

Abolition of NHS and healthcare returned to the free market;drugs to be freely available from retailers,not limited to certain outlets as at present

Abolition of council housing and an end to all government involvement in house building

Abolition of Scottish,welsh and irish parliaments

Prisons privately run but subject to state oversight and regulation,prisoners to work and defray living expenses

Abolition of All quangos

Legalisation of fox hunting

A Christmas wish

May the British people finally wake up to the absurdity of having a monarchy in the 21st century and divest themselves of this parasitic institution with its hangers on and  cease its fawning over this degenerate dysfunctional family with its entitlement welfare mentality.Selling off its possession and property bought with blood and tears and plunder over the centuries would pay off 7 billion of the national debt and free the country of its oppressive history and its forelock tugging obesiance to tyranny which the monarchy  is a symbol of today albeit in its delimited  form today. The mad would be king Charles with his eco obsessions and pro muslim sentiments has spent most of his adult life meddling in British politics and must not be allowed to assume the throne so it is essential for the monarchy to be dissolved before this happens.

Religion and its philosophical base

If a religious leader makes a speech on world affairs pretty much without exception its contents can be predicted as they follow a familiar trajectory unchanged for centuries and will contain certain elements varying only in minor deviations and detail as befits the events of the day.The unerring message will be that the problems of the world can only be addressed by unselfishness,self sacrifice,charity,love and that, translated into politics, this will entail:collectivism,socialism,redistribution of wealth,repudiation of profit, and all of this will be interlarded with an assault on private enterprise,attacks on individualism,materialism and the intellect.This was pretty much the message that the pope delivered in the EU parliament recently and needless to say it was met with rapturous applause.This phenomenon described can be the cause of only two things.Either this is a misrepresentation of the true message of Christianity on the part of the pope and this seems unlikely as he is a learned man or the very essence and philosophy of christianity is pure unadulterated evil.Assuming it is the latter then we need to examine what is at the heart of this philosophy which is common it must be said across all the main religions and probably all the other lesser known religions as well.The essence or base of this philosophy is of course altruism -the idea that humans beings exist not for their own hapiness and fulfillment but for that of  others who they must sacrifice  to and this and this alone is the only purpose to their life.And the only possible political translation of this philosophy is collectivism,the common good for whom individuals are to be sacrificed.All goverments justify their social programmes by the altruist code of self sacrifice invoking its religious roots and it is the prevailing ideology of the age and indeed most past ages.This is the moral evil that has to be confronted and it can only be done on philosophical grounds as this is the battle ground the collectivist have chosen to wage their war for centuries on man and the individualism that stands in their way to complete tyranny.

Statism versus the non- coercive State

When discussing the evils of statism with folk the standard response is 'so you are an anarchist then?' as if the only solution to an over bearing state were no state at all.The majority of such respondents say this out of genuine confusion but others deploy such an argument as a smear to deter people from exploring alternatives to statism.The answer to statism is a limited state,a capitalist system under the rule of objective law and moreover - and this is the essential element of the dynamic - a state funded by voluntary contribution,voluntary taxation if you will, thus removing the coercive element of taxation which is theft by the state.The state is not a necessary evil but a necessary good.Unlike most libertarians and anarchists the state is not viewed with hostility as something to be abolished but as the essential safeguard of freedom liberty and the rule of law within a capitalist system.The state has a monopoly of force and without it the anarchy witnessed in some african states and parts of the middle east would prevail.Imagine rival police forces and militias and rival legal systems fighting it out on the streets and you begin to see the anarchy and mayhem that would result from competing legal and police forces.

Torture. So What

The liberal's much ventilated and public angst over the torture by western governments of suspected islamic terrorists speaks not to their virtue but their moral decadence.In war the objective is to win as expeditiously as possible in the shortest amount of time with the least number of casualties to one's own side by whatever means available including torture.The notion of applying queensberry rules to Isis is beyond the absurd.The goal should be to terrorise the terrorists.Even friends trot out the argument that to use the same methods as the enemy is to be no better than the enemy but even a cursory examination of this argument is to expose its fallacious not to say immoral nature.It is immoral because it covertly and sinuously seeks to obliterate the moral distinction between the perpetrator of violence and the victim.By the very act of daring to retaliate against the perpetrator the victim condemns himself to moral equivalence with the perpetrator.One only has to ask who benefits from such a rationalisation to see the evil of it.If by the very act of retaliating against an agressor the victim is rendered   automatically immoral the only outcome is paralysis of the victim and the triumph of the criminal.Hence the moral evil and depravity of the liberal argument that to fight the terrorists with their own weapons is to be no better than the terrorists.The only possible outcome can be victory of the terrorists and the end of freedom which is what we can observe on the world stage today.

Democracy and its sollution

Democracy is illiberal ergo it cannot be ended via the democratic process.If as it clearly does democracy violates principles of liberty freedom and individual rights its continuation or otherwise cannot logically be subjected to a vote.As individual rights are inviolable and flow from the very reality of the requirement of human existence then they cannot possibly be subject to the whim of  majority decision.You cannot vote to enslave your fellow man and even if 99 people out of a hundred wish to violate the rights of the hundredth this they cannot do.So if democracy is to be ended it will not and cannot be done via the ballot box.This does not mean violence will be inevitable but neither does it exclude its possibility.It is for those who think individual rights liberty and freedom can be extinguished from human affairs via the democratic will to justify their position,not those who reject such a  monstrous proposition.

Life on Marrs

Watching a re run of the history of modern Britain with Andrew Marr recently I was struck and amused by his absurd leftist bias when covering the birth of that socialist monstrosity the NHS.Barely could he contain himself as he drooled over this great achievement of civilization, totally ignoring the erosion of individual liberty it involved;the desired end of 'free' healthcare totally justified the illiberal means to get there,ho hum.To the left human beings are not individuals at all but mere ciphers,a collectivist blob to be fashioned and shaped,to be pushed here and there to achieve the egalitarian utopia of fairness and equality for all.The fairness of course turns out to be unfairness and the equality the equality of slavery.

The left and its strange sympathies

Watching George Galloway interviewing the daughter of Che Guevara on the Soviet TV chanel RT,  drooling and   almost wetting himself in the presence at one remove of such a hero of the Left it makes me wonder why the left romanticises totalitarianism and hero worships an obvious thug hoodlum and criminal like Che Guevara.Perhaps its the same reason why some people romanticise the mafia - the Godfather syndrome.Whilst the left would recoil in horror at the totalitarian Right they seem to develop myopia when it is their side doing the tyranny.The end justifies the means I suppose.If individual rights,liberty and freedom have to be sacrificed to create their leftist vision of 'fairness' then so be it.When such contempt for liberty and disregard for individual rights prevails it is hardly surprising that the result is a charnel house of death and destruction on an industrial scale.There is very little difference between the martyrisation and deification of Che and that of the the Jihadi sucide bombers and Isil whose militant Islamism is not so different from  Marxism in its colletivist dystopic vision..

Immigration and the debate we never have

One thing never heard in any debate on what we should do about mass immigration is the argument that we cannot have mass immigration because how will Tesco,Asda,Lidl,Pound shop cope with the demands of all those people coming into the country.No,we only hear the argument how can the NHS,our schools our transport,social services and all the state infrastructure cope with all the demands made upon it by the immigrants. The solution then is staring us in the face.Let all those services be run on capitalist principles,then there would be no shortages,no waiting lists.But of course we are wedded to a discredited 19th century ideology of socialism,so we end up vexing about how many people can come into the country ,in other words approaching the argument entirely from the wrong end .Open borders under capitalism are no problem but it is impossible when people are dependent upon inefficient corrupt state public services characterised by incompetence,protectionism,lack of innovation,  and stagnation.Capitalism is the answer to immigration,socialism is the problem.

Democracy's dirty big secret

What an ingenious thing democracy is! It enables you to steal from your neighbour  using the state as a proxy thief- via taxation but it also enables your  neighbour to steal from you! So everyone ends up the same except of course in the act of larceny everyone is morally depraved.No one has any power or autonomy,it has been taken by the state hence the inability of anyone to change the system that has us locked into mendacity with no hope of change unless the whole system of democracy is rejected and a system based on individual rights ie capitalism replaces it. Only an outright rejection of the kleptocratic model of democracy will secure liberty for the people.It has been rightly said that democracy gives each man the right to be his own dictator but the only thing this can result in is tyranny for all as anything you do to your neighbour they can do to you.Remove coercion from human affairs,let people come together through voluntary association to trade,take the state's power away to steal through taxation and society will flourish,wealth and innovation and entrepreneurialism will flow and people will get back their s liberty so craftily and artfully stolen from them.

Stonehengenomics

The ridiculous slab monument of stonehenge the product of slave labour no doubt and sublime in its senselessnes and epic Sisisiphean  futility is a fitting monument to the sensless economics of the coalition as it seeks to build its way out of bankruptcy by piling up yet more debt for the slaves of the future to pay off in perpetuity.People come from all round the world to gawp at these monuments of nothingness,as vacuous as the operations of our present day neolithic politicians in their deluded arrogance and myopia.

John Grey Anatomy of a liberal

A chief characteristic of liberals like John Grey is their persistence in presenting their opponents ie those who advocate free market capitalism as hopeless, comical  and deluded ideologues whilst Liberal statists likehim on the other hand  who believe the state is pretty much the answer to any problem moral or economic are UN ideological!For some mysterious reason they seem to get away with this unchallenged.Proceeding thus on the foundation of a deception they then attack capitalism and free market  totally ignoring the fact that such a system does not actually exist other than in theory as the system we live under and actually pretty much in all democracies around the world is a mixed economy,hedged in with gazillions of regulations and taxation -the very antithesis of capitalism and free markets! I wonder if it is possible to advance liberal philosophy without having to resort to deliberate and wilfull misrepresentation.If such a learned and intellectually acomplished academic like Mr Grey cannot manage it I think it is safe to say that it is not.

Andrew Mitchell Served His Ass on a plate

A most unpleasant character has finally been hoist on his own peturd and faced justice at last.A serial  well documented abuser of the police and profligate dispenser of other people's money to every hell hole on earth via foreign aid it is good this  public menace has been put out of action and bankrupted  as he has bankrupted the public with his perverted vicarious philanthropy.His pathetic green posturing with his bycycle riding thru London is another reason I and many others will be glad to see the back of him.British justice served I think.

Racist Thugs Loot and Rampage in Ferguson

The media has got  this all wrong, and it is deliberate.Falsification of character and events.The beatification of Michael Brown small time thug and petty criminal is now complete.The inconvenient truth of the video of him robbing a store is forgotten and airbrushed out.To refer to it at all is of course, (you guessed it) Racist.Take a look at where the hoodlums and criminals looters and barbarians are directing their anger and rage.Small businesses,stores,products of capitalism and industry and commerce, you know, products of  uniquely American values which most of the rioters are almost certainly unaquainted with.These are the enemy they wish to destroy.Why not let them have their wish and deport them to a more appropriate environment for them,one they would really feel at home in like Sudan where anarchy reigns and they can kill and loot at will in a looters paradise.They certainly do not belong in America.Shame on them,the ugly racist tribalist collectivist subhumans that they are.And shame of the western liberal media for so hideously and criminally misrepresenting these events and by so doing fanning the flames of unreason and barbarism to who knows what tragic end.

Redrawing the Frontiers of the State for the 21st Century

Analogue politics in a digital age is no longer sustainable..Its so 20th century and the electorate are getting restless and UKIP are riding the wave of national consciouness that is febrile and restless and intolerant of the statist hegemonists of two party politics.Something better change is the now general consensus although it is not altogether focused as yet.The trajectory to a smaller reduced state requires  clear articulation and reasoned argument that has barely begun.The challenge is great but must be risen to and a good place to start would be to point out that a big paternalist state that we have now infantilises the population,strips them of independence,denies them their liberty and keeps them in a permanent state  of impotence and resentment.Tapping in to current discontent such a debate would lead to the conclusion that the state should do less and then a disussion on how its frontiers could be redrawn radically, emphasising individual choice in areas such as health and education,removing the state from these spheres and introducing the notion that taxation is more an unecessary evil than a necessary good.This is but a very sketchy brief unfleshed out indication of the direction of travel towards the small state predicated on individual rights and away from the statism that has gradually grown over the last two centuries to our  present very illiberal State.

Ukip Ukip Hurray!

The latest UKIP win in Rochester and Strood is proof positive that there is a new force in British politics shaking up the corrupt ancien regime statist quo and bringing to bear shafts of fresh air and light onto the stale rancid fetid Westminster dungheap.The only caveat is the unfortunate but perhaps  electorally understandable UKIP tendency of appealing to disaffected Labour voters by tacking to the Left vis a vis support of the NHS and in an act of political contortionsm to the nationalist right at the same time with its anti immigration schtick when the real target should remain of course the evil empire of the EU and its nefarious criminal monstrous reach.But way to go UKIP and the trajectory is onwards and upwards.

The Devolution Trojan Horse

It has always struck me as strange that when people criticise goverment and politicians their main beef seems to be summed up in the oft repeated phrase 'polititicans are too remote' whilst for me my main beef is they are not remote enough.How about moving them to Pluto? So as a supposed remedy they are now proposing that old impostor/sop/palliative called devolution.This is the now desperate politicians last bid for holding on to the power they see slipping away from them due to public disgust at their corrupt thieving ways.In reality all devolution amounts to is the adding of further layers of bureaucracy to an overladen State and worse still bringing Big Brother to your doorstep,localising the tyranny.It is the same socialist mindset,just nearer to home in the form of Maoist localism.The devil is in the devilution and it should be eschewed as yet another form of statism with the cynical application of a fresh lick of paint and a modish name designed to hoodwink the untutored in the dark arts of statecraft.Devolution is classic divide and rule tactics by a morribund political class,pitching region against region and effectively balkanising the nation State; all the more easy to control and diffuse any genuine revolt by the people against the depraved political liberal elites.

The NHS Cult

A health system run on socialist lines? (yeah,that oughta work).Mr Milliband seemed to think he had a clinching argument with the redoubtable aformentioned Myleen Klas when he sought to justify the Marxist mansion tax grab on the grounds that the NHS needed more money.And Dracula needs more blood! A need is not a claim on the lives of others and Socialism,a discredited ideological 20th century mistake is no basis upon which to base a healthcare system - or anything else for that matter, as history amply illustrates.Why when across the world socialism has been jettisoned into the dusbin of history do we still persist in applying it to  our healthcare system of all things?And why does the political class insist on a system that has killed hundreds of thousands of people which if it were a private company would have been closed down a long time ago and those responsible thrown in jail? This is intellectual failure on a simply staggering scale,a betrayal on a scale impossible to calculate or barely grasp,yet so it is.

Imagine getting a character reference from Bob Geldolf!

It happened to former foreign aid minister involved in plebgate whose name thankfully escapes me.Hasn't the man suffered enough?Small surprise that the Irish windbag would lend support to Mr Mitchel whose name has returned lol as it was he who like nothing more than to sprinkle taxpayers money on every godforsaken hellhole he could find across the globe with prodigal liberality.Of course such nonentites get the only self esteem open to them via this perverted vicarious philanthropy getting a para sexual thrill giving other people's money away.The UK is staggering punchdrunk under a mountain of goverment debt and these sociopaths think it a good idea to add to our debt burden and our children's children's  with yet more.Don't they belong in prison not for calling a policman a pleb but for their wholesale industrial larceny?

Why Democracy Sucks

Imagine going to a store for baked beans and being told you can only have a tin of peas.When you object you are told if you do not like it you will have to have a tin spagetti instead.Would you go back to that store again.Well the strongest argument the tories can muster to vote for them is if we do not and choose UKIP instead we will get Labour!The insanity of it all beggars belief but this we are told is the best system available,it is called democracy and people have died to secure it.No one believes this anymore,it is bollocks and we do not have to put up with it anymore.The game is up.Democracy is a raddled crone ripe for euthanasia.